From Feb 3, 2008

For the last three weeks we have been preparing for our parish Town Hall meeting scheduled for Sunday, 24 February (not on 10 February as was preciously announced). Just as a reminder, we are conducting this Town Hall Meeting to surface our community’s deepest values concerning the Liturgy so that we may enhance our celebrations here in light of those felt and expressed aspirations, the Church’s conciliar and post-conciliar teachings, and liturgical laws by which we are bound.  This is no easy task and so we have been reviewing together what the Church has taught especially at the Second Vatican Council which guides our theology and practices to this day.

 

            We first recalled the great insights around what it means to be catholic that is, universal; collegiality; ecumenism; interfaith dialogue, evangelization; justice and peace; the universal call to holiness; and collaboration of ministry. We have since then looked specifically at the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy and what it upholds as values; thus far: the paschal mystery and full, conscious, active participation.

 

            Let us look a little more into participation, since it is the value mentioned more than any other—more than seventeen (17) times, in fact.

 

Intimate participation is not some distant dream; it is a current reality, for full, conscious, active participation, by the way, is already in our North American bones. I have seen it firsthand.  So have you.  Go to any sports’ event and you will witness participation writ large.

 

John Savant in a provocative article in Commonweal in 2003 “attributes engagement in sports to its ritualized violence and encounter with risk and chance. Games’ outcomes are not known beforehand. Odds-on favorites are often defeated—even the most professional athletes make mistakes, and sometimes through grit, determination and luck underdogs prevail. All of this brings an element of suspense and drama to sport [John Savant, “The Saving Grace of Sport,” Commonweal 130 (September, 26, 2003): 12-14].

           

            No doubt some of you are saying to yourselves: “Yes, that’s true of sport, but what about our Sunday celebration of the Eucharist? It offers no surprises. We know that sin and death are trounced; that Jesus reigns victorious o’er the grave; that God is still God; that standing at the Father’s right hand in the power of the Holy Spirit Christ Jesus still labors in love on our behalf. The drama is drained and the suspense suspended.” Not so, say others.  The paschal mystery is still the greatest drama of all, if we but take advantage of making the connection between the mysteries we celebrate and our continual, life and death struggle to follow Jesus with all our heart, with all our mind, with all our strength.  And in that struggle, we do not know for certain how our drama unfolds or ends; for we still have free will and can choose death instead of life—life to the full.

 

Full, conscious, active participation in every aspect of the Eucharist can transform us so that we can transform the world.  Here’s just one example. Every Collect (Opening Prayer) has the power to engage; for each Collect begins with a time of silence.  In that profound silence we are afforded—in the words of Mark Searle—”a precious opportunity to lower [ourselves] gently into the depths of the Spirit” [Mark Searle, Barbara Searle and Anne Y. Koester, ed., Called to Participate: Theological, Ritual, and Social Perspectives (Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 2006), 16]. There in that silence, “the Spirit intercedes with sighs too deep for words,” naming our joys and hoes, our grief and anxiety before the Lord who has the power to set us free. (See Romans 8:26).

That’s transforming participation.

           

            It should be further noted that our participation is both hierarchical and communal. Norms Drawn from the Hierarchic and Communal Nature of the Liturgy from the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy states in numbers 26 and 28:

 

Liturgical services are not private functions but are celebrations of the Church, which is the “sacrament of unity,” namely, the holy people united and ordered under their bishops. Therefore, liturgical services pertain to the whole body of the Church; they manifest it and have effects upon it, but they concern the individual members of the Church in different ways, according to their differing rank, office and actual participation.

 

In liturgical celebrations each person, minister or layperson, who has an office to perform, should do all of but only those parts which pertain to that office by the nature of the rite and the principles of liturgy.

 

Fr James Field, almost thirty years ago reminded us: “This does not mean that we, who are one in Christ Jesus, are for liturgical purposes to be divided into groups according to the relative merits of our states in life, but rather that the members of the assembly each have their own role to fulfill.  Application of this simple principle means that no member of the community will usurp the role proper to another (”Participation and Ministry” Assembly 6 (September 1979):70. We are one Body; we share one faith, on Baptism so that we may be of service to one another and the world. That’s a great value.  Amen? Amen!

 

J–Glenn Murray, SJ